Paranormal Message Board > Leonard Rowe - Michael Jackson's Will a Fake
Leonard Rowe - Michael Jackson's Will a Fake



Login  |  Register
Page: 1

sdparanormal
664 posts
Sep 24, 2010
8:15 AM
Hi Everyone,

For those of us who have been investigating and following the murder case, this information is not new. What I am glad to hear is that the family is at least having meetings regarding the fake Will and those running the estate worth billions of dollars on an invalid Will. Radar On-Line may claim skepticism, but anyone who has looked into this knows that Leonard Rowe is telling the truth and Michael's whereabouts and his protests against Tommy Mottola and Sony are well documented. I find it interesting that Tommy Mottola was on the Today Show shortly after Michael's death claiming to be the gatekeeper of Michael's unreleased work. Michael was no longer a Sony artist and Tommy Mottola was no longer an employee of Sony. Of course we now know that the estate turned over the unreleased work to Sony even though they were not the highest bidder, claiming a long standing and good relationship with Michael.

You will need to click on the link to view the video.

Thx to Carmen for bring this to my attention. See videos below of Joe Jackson and Leonard Rowe on Larry King Live back on July 2009. Leonard Rowe's comments to Larry King are very consistent with his new book. You will notice that Larry tries several times to change the subject.


http://www.radaronline.com/exclusives/2010/06/exclusive-video-interview-michael-jacksons-will-fake-says-his-former-advisor



EXCLUSIVE VIDEO INTERVIEW:Michael Jackson's Will Fake, SaysHis Former Advisor





Janet Jackson hosted a two-hour meeting of her famous family during which private investigators presented explosive evidence to claim Michael's will and trust is a fake, according to one of the King of Pop's former advisors.




Leonard Rowe told RadarOnline.com that investigators — commissioned by Michael’s younger brother Randy — proved a 2002 will the singer wrote is not valid because of a string of errors and a question over his whereabouts the date it was signed.



Rowe, Jackson's longtime friend and sometime financial advisor, revealed Janet chaired the recent roundtable at her Californian home



Investigators cited incorrect names of the pop star’s children and misspellings of second wife Debbie Rowe’s middle name, as key evidence.



“Michael would never misspell his children’s names -- especially on a document that important,” Rowe told RadarOnline.com, in an exclusive interview.



In the document, daughter Paris’ middle name is wrong. Lawyers had forgotten that part of her middle name was Michael -- Paris Michael Katherine Jackson.



Youngest son Blanket was listed by his nickname and middle name Joseph. His birth certificate names him as Prince Michael Jackson II.



Rowe said the investigation was spearheaded by Randy Jackson, himself and Brian Oxman, the Jackson family spokesman and attorney.



Family patriarch Joe Jackson -- who also is questioning the validity of his son’s will, which excluded him -- was not part of the investigation, Rowe said.



Rowe also revealed that Reverend Al Sharpton was prepared to come forward as a witness in their case.



Another explosive challenge to the will that named John Branca and John McClain as administrators of the superstar’s posthumous affairs is its signature date.



On the document, it shows Jackson signed it into effect on July 7, 2002.



However, Rowe said the pop star was in Los Angeles on that day.



The singer spent three days from July 6 to July 9 filing a petition against his record label executive Tommy Mottola in a long running court case with Sony music.



Rowe said Rev. Sharpton is willing to swear in an affidavit that he was with Jackson in New York on July 7.



“The whole world saw that Michael Jackson was in New York,” Rowe told RadarOnline.com.



“There’s footage of Michael with Rev. Sharpton on CNN.”



There are also hotel receipts to prove Jackson stayed in New York on July 7, Rowe added.



He said Jackson’s security team was also prepared to provide statements to prove his whereabouts at the time that the will was supposedly signed.



Last September, Los Angeles superior court Judge Mitchell Beckloff signed off on the papers, deeming it the most recent will.



The will named Jackson's 80-year-old mother Katherine as guardian of his three children and ordered that all his assets be moved into an entity known as the Michael Jackson Family Trust.



According to the document, Jackson's kids will receive 40 percent of their father's $300 million estate.



It also appointed as executors John Branca, a lawyer who began representing Jackson in 1980, and John McClain, a founder of Interscope Records.



“What would really solve a lot of questions about this will... there are three of four witnesses who are supposed to have witnessed the signing of the will,” Rowe said.



“I wish the estate would come forth with these witnesses.”



Rowe, no relation to Jackson's ex-wife, is releasing a tell-all book titled What Really Happened To Michael Jackson, to coincide with the one-year anniversary of Jackson’s death.



His allegations about Jackson’s death have been met with skepticism by some, who cite his time in prison after being convicted of wire fraud for his role in the cashing of a fraudulent insurance check.



But Rowe insists Jackson hired him to oversee his business and financial affairs during the scheduled London concert tour, This Is It.






RECORDED JULY 20, 2009 JOE JACKSON AND LEONARD ROWE ON LARRY KING LIVE.








July 7th 2009 Tommy Mottola appears on the Today Show. He is introduced as the "Gatekeeper". Note the caption says "Former President and CEO of Sony Music". WHY WOULD HE BE THE GATEKEEPER? SINCE HE NO LONGER WORKS FOR SONY, WHY WOULD HE WANT SONY TO RECEIVE THE UNRELEASED MATERIAL? HOW DID HE KNOW ON JULY 7TH 2009 THAT SONY WOULD MONTHS LATER BE AWARDED THE UNRELEASED WORKS BY THE ESTATE? WHERE DID THIS MATERIAL COME FROM, MICHAEL WAS NOT A SONY ARTIST AT THE TIME OF HIS DEATH?

Last Edited by on Sep 24, 2010 10:27 AM
Irina
411 posts
Sep 24, 2010
8:36 AM
Thank You Bonnie, Carmen,

I am glad to hear they are pulling together physical evidence of this. Sounds like they are gathering ammunition. Al Sharpton is willing to come forward on the record, the hotel and air fair bills would certainly do the job.
Also the local and national news were covering this. CNN is already mentioned and there is a local FOX station interview with Rita Cosby, which is was posted here as well. The media would have all the dates and locations. I hope they can access that information in as well.
Proof of Michael being in New York on that day is everywhere.


Irina

Last Edited by on Sep 24, 2010 8:40 AM
Carmen68
475 posts
Sep 24, 2010
10:21 AM
Hello Bonnie and Irina, and all our other members and lurkers.

What I found interesting about this information when I came across it last night was the following:
1) Leonard Rowe is stating some key things and pieces of information publicly and LIVE, in such a way that there is no room for doubters to say, "Well, it's a written interview, and maybe he was misquoted," or, "It's coming from a tabloid site, so we really can't take this information at face value as coming from Mr. Rowe," etc. He is stating certain things as FACT and stating them LIVE on video.
2) He states that Janet and other family members are aware that something about the 2002 Will as signed and presented by John Branca does not appear to align properly with dates and times of Michael Jackson's true physical location on the day in which the Will was signed.
3) Rowe comments on the inaccuracy of the children's names on the Will. A Will is a very important document, and in the case of THE Michael Jackson, millions and millions of dollars, not to mention the care of his beloved children, would be at stake.
4) We had been commenting here, and other MJ fans and supporters have been commenting on other boards, that Al Sharpton and others could serve as eye witnesses for Michael's whereabouts that day, so why haven't they come forward? Well, now it would seem, according to Mr. Rowe, that Mr. Sharpton is willing to go on public record and perhaps go to court for Michael on this issue. My personal guess is that Mr. Sharpton and others now feel safer about coming forward and may have been provided with some personal protection so as to feel more free to speak openly and honestly.
5) I stated some time ago that I wondered about air line records, some kind of air line data base that should be accessible in such a situation, and that there should be receipts and some other forms of documentation about Michael's whereabouts on that day. It's good to know that Mr. Rowe and others are thinking in terms of receipts, hotel bills, airline tickets and costs that would have been recorded some where, etc.
6) Those witnesses who signed the Will in question should be forced to step forward and under penalty of perjury, state once and for all, for the record, where they were that day when the Will in question was signed. The attorneys present have already gone on public record, if what I read some time ago is true, that they made a mistake about the location and that they were in New York at the time. They somehow got Los Angeles mixed up with New York. What's odd is that all those present 'forgot' to 'remember' where they all were at the time.
6) I'm not even going to get into Michael's signatures and initialed segments. All Mr. Rowe and Michael's family members would need are a couple of top notch respected hand writing analysts, and any forgeries would be revealed.

That's all I wanted to say. I'm pleased and glad to know that the whole Jackson family is thinking, questioning, supporting Michael each in their own way, and fighting for the truth to come out. It's not going to come out easily or without a fight and legal costs, but little by little, as Irina said, the pieces are bubbling to the surface. One advantage to the criss crossing law suits is that we're getting more information and more facts and more truth than we had previously.

Warmly,
Carmen

Last Edited by on Sep 24, 2010 10:25 AM
Carmen68
476 posts
Sep 24, 2010
10:30 AM
Hello Bonnie. :)

I'll be sure to watch your added video segments when I get home this evening. In terms of Mottola 'knowing' what would come to pass in terms of future Michael Jackson music deals between Sony and the Estate, there is one highly convenient, coincidental conflict-of-interest connection between Sony and Michael Jackson's Estate. Michael had fired that "highly convenient, coincidental conflict-of-interest connection" back in early 2003, if I recall correctly.

Without that "highly convenient, coincidental conflict-of-interest connection," some things would be quite different regarding Sony and the Estate. I state this as my personal opinion, of course. I can prove nothing as fact.

~Carmen~
Irina
420 posts
Sep 27, 2010
10:13 PM
Bonnie,
I just saw that you've added the interviews of Joe and Leonard Rowe and Mottola. Watched them live last year and found it all very intriguing back then too.

Carmen,
I happen to share your opinion. Convenient connection who won't stay fired it seems.

Sony just eased right back in there didn't they?

I as well wonder how it is that Mottola, who is officially no longer employed by Sony, swiftly appears on the scene and claims authority over Michael's music. Peculiar to say the least.
???

Still following the money...

Last Edited by on Sep 27, 2010 10:18 PM
Irina
449 posts
Oct 12, 2010
10:57 AM
To keep answering your question above Bonnie I have added some more to the Mottola/ Sony thread concerning this.
By all appearances the rights to Michael's recordings are still held by Epic/ Legacy under the Sony Music Entertainment umbrella.
HTW
405 posts
Mar 13, 2012
11:27 PM
Also this one should be back to our attention.
It needs to move forth!!

Last Edited by on Mar 13, 2012 11:27 PM
sdparanormal
2000 posts
Jul 18, 2012
12:09 PM
There seems to be posts missing from the beginning of this thread. Just want to point out that others have also said publicly the will is fake.

The letter put out by the family recently is part of an ongoing battle that formally started with legal action by Joe Jackson and Brian Oxman in 2009.

It is false to say the will has been upheld. Joe Jackson tried to contest the will. The judge threw it out refusing to look at any evidence, simply because Joe Jackson was not mentioned in the fake will. This is a far cry from being upheld.

IMHO,
Bonnie


Post a Message
Guest Name

Message

(4096 Characters Left)



Please enter the code shown above and click the 'Post Message' button. This additional step is required to help protect against message spam.






Web Design by Genesis Creations

 

©Copyright 2002-2013 San Diego Paranormal.  Copying content or pictures from this site is prohibited. Copying of any portion of this site for commercial use is expressly prohibited.