Header Graphic
Paranormal News provided by Medium Bonnie Vent > Understanding Jack (The Ripper)


google.com, pub-0240078091788753, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Need a reading, mandala or some jewelry?  Check it out. 

Bonnie Vent products and services website

 

Readings/Consultation button




19 Jan 2007

Understanding Jack (The Ripper)
http://english.ohmynews.com/articleview/article_view.asp?article_class=5&no=340621&rel_no=1

Understanding Jack

Who Jack the Ripper was and what he did
Nicolas van der Leek (Nick)    
There's a reason why Jack the Ripper is a name that is still used and
remembered 119 years later. And if you're superstitious about numbers,
here's a number for you: 1888. That's the year it all happened.

If you live in South Africa as I do, where violent crime is a staple in
our local newspapers, then it's tempting to wonder how Jack the Ripper
ever made a name for himself. Surely there have been criminals far more
vile and depraved than he was? Once again, there's a good reason why the
name Jack the Ripper is remembered more than a hundred years after his
crimes, and despite the comings and goings of thousands of brutal
murderers and their murderous deeds.

The reason I am writing this article about Jack the Ripper is because I
recently visited my sister where she works in the mountains, and I spent
some time idly browsing through her bookshelf. I found a book by Terry
Pratchett, some other pulp fiction, and then I pulled out a slim novel.
I quickly thumbed through the pages and soon I was captured by the dark
spell of what happened in 1888. Let me warn you a final time: there is a
very good reason why this criminal has the notoriety that he does.

During the time that a series of incredibly violent killings took place,
the Central News Agency received a number of letters written by someone
claiming to be the murderer. Although plenty of hoax letters were also
received, three letters are commonly believed to be genuine. I will not
reproduce them here, but I'd encourage readers to google the "Dear Boss"
letter (dated Sept. 25, 1888), the "Saucy Jack" postcard (Oct. 1, 1888)
and the letter "From Hell" (postmarked Oct. 15, 1888). All three are
chilling, and the third is particularly hard to decipher. This being the
case, as one studies the maniacal handwriting, the content in "From
Hell" slowly begins to manifest: "fried and ate" refers to the other
half of Catherine Eddowes' kidney (the 4th of the "canonical" five
victims), half of which was provided with the letter in a small box.

What makes the Ripper story even more grotesque is the uncertainty
surrounding the case. What I mean is that while five victims (all
prostitutes, all murdered between August 1888 and November 1888) have
been identified by authorities such as Sir Melville Macnaughten as
"belonging" to one serial killer, there is a long list, with as many as
thirteen, other possible victims. It soon becomes obvious that London
was a cesspool of crime in those days, and these crimes were
particularly heinous in that they were aimed at women, and the slaughter
was almost without exception, violent and disturbing. For a murderer to
gain fame, to stand out, under such circumstances is particularly
horrible, and almost unimaginable.

These then are the achievements of Jack the Ripper:
Mary Ann Nichols was the first victim, discovered in Buck's Row at 3:40
a.m. on Aug. 31, 1888. She was discovered, like the victims after her,
with vicious slashes (perhaps just a single, or two slashes) to her
throat. The Ripper quickly achieved a sickening and repulsive
reputation, so much so that the street of this first murder was renamed
Durward Street (in Whitechapel, close to the London Hospital).
Annie Chapman was around 4 years older than Mary Ann Nichols. She was
discovered without her uterus, on Sept. 8, 1888. Elizabeth Stride was
just two years younger than Chapman, and originally born in Sweden. She
was killed on Sunday Sept. 30, 1888, and discovered at 1 a.m. off Berner
Street (since renamed Henriques Street) in Whitechapel. Catherine
Eddowes was just one year older than Stride, and killed on the same day
as Stride. The "Saucy Jack" postcard made reference to a "double event
this time," and the handwriting in all three pieces are similar.

What I noticed when looking at the handwriting was the savagery in the
letter "t." The side of the brim (crossing the t) hooks downward in a
manner that does indeed suggest malice.
Early in the morning of Sept. 30 (the day of the double murder), police
fanned out, hoping to locate evidence or the suspect himself. At around
3 a.m. Constable Alfred Long came upon a scrap of cloth near an
apartment building in Goulston Street. The cloth was later linked to
Eddowes' apron, but more sinister was the writing, chalked on the wall
behind it: "The Juwes are the men That Will not be Blamed for nothing."
The Police Superintendent on the scene, fearing a worsening of the
prevailing religious tension (and especially anti-Semitism), ordered the
graffiti to be removed from the wall.
This occurred, despite arguments between the officers on the scene, at
5:30 a.m., and without having the graffiti photographed first.
Some believed the Ripper murders were the work of a Jew some called the
"Leather Apron." Some believe the Ripper tried to reinforce the link to
"Leather Apron" by intentionally dropping the cloth where it was found.
Personally I believe that the message was already there and the murderer
dropped the scrap by mere coincidence. Be that as it may, the graffiti
(with the double negative feature) appears to be written by a Cockney,
and the standard translation would be: "The Jews are men who will not
take the blame for anything." It was written by someone who must have
felt wronged by someone Jewish, and there were many in the area at that
time.

Jack the Ripper achieved unparalleled publicity. Because of reforms to
the Stamp Act (in 1855), it was possible to publish and circulate
newspapers at a scale hitherto unheard of. It was also the dawn of mass
circulation of newspapers, and a time where plenty of local content
newspapers and magazine came into existence (including the Illustrated
Police News). It has also been suggested that the name "Jack the Ripper"
was coined by newspapermen, in order to sell more newspapers. If this
was the case, it provided the blueprint for the serializing of serial
killers that came afterwards, including the "Boston Strangler" and in
the 1960s, "Jack the Stripper."

While the conjecture is interesting, the haunting reality remains that
we still do not know for sure who Jack the Ripper was. He was never
caught, or convicted. His fifth murder was also the most troubling of
them all. Mary Jane Kelly was Irish (born in Limerick) and was different
from the other 4 in that she was born in 1863 (the others were all born
in the 1840s). She was 25, 20 odd years younger than the other victims.
And unlike the other victims, she was discovered much later, at 10:45
a.m., Nov. 9, 1888, in the room where she lived (13 Miller's Court,
Dorset Street).

Kelly had invited the killer into her room (which suggests the killer
must have appeared respectable and well mannered), and here he was able
to perform his macabre activities for as long as he wished. In the book
that I found on my sister's bookshelf, there was a grainy photograph of
Kelly. It's difficult to describe just how gruesome her body had been
mutilated.

She had been disemboweled, the white bone of her femur was visible after
chunks of her flesh had been removed (and skewered on picture hooks in
the room). It is difficult to make out the face in the photograph,
because with the neck having being severely cut, and along with
lacerations to her face, the skin unfolded.
In the picture it's obvious that the body has been butchered almost
entirely, for it was found with the heart missing, and many other
internal organs scattered about the room. And as in the other murders,
there were extensive lacerations to the genital area and the abdominal
area.

Suffice it to say the picture of Kelly provides an extremely disturbing
portrait of Jack the Ripper.
So, who and what are we dealing with? The Ripper murders are
characterized by progression. Each murder goes further than the last (in
terms of brutality). Throat cuts and the removal of organs as well as
progressive facial mutilations typify the canonical five. We can
reasonably assume a frenzy of excitement taking hold of the murderer,
one that is intensified with incisions, particularly to the lower
abdominal area. All the murders occurred on or near weekends, they
happened at night, often at the end of the month (or close to it), and
in out-of-the-way quarters with public access. Each murder began with
the slashing of the throat, and in the case of Stride, it has been
argued that the murderer was interrupted (but another victim was taken
later the same night).

The worldwide media frenzy that the Ripper unleashed did have a positive
side-effect. It created awareness of the poverty and harsh conditions
prevailing in parts of London at the time, and reformers were able to
build on this awareness to change the conditions there.
While it's possible that Jack the Ripper had many more victims, or
possibly that he committed some of the crimes mentioned above (but not
all), someone perpetrated these crimes. In fact, there was at least one
witness who provided a description of a man leaving with her friend. And
it must be answered, how was this man able to walk in the early light of
day, unseen, able to hide his bloodstained hands and clothes? Many
believe the Ripper must have lived in close proximity to the murders,
and indeed, all the murders mentioned above occurred in a specific part
of London.

Today many believe that Montague John Druitt was Jack the Ripper, and I
am one of them. Born in Dorset, he was the son of a well-known
physician. He enjoyed cricket, and was good at sports (which would
explain strong hands and arms, and being fleet of foot). Many experts
have speculated that the Ripper ought to have some medical background to
have performed his surgeries and extracted the organs (knowing where to
find them) as quickly as he did. Having grown up in a family filled with
physicians (his brother was also a doctor), not only would he have been
exposed to the tools of the trade, but also books and materials
detailing the internal human body. And Druitt quite possibly felt angry
about his decision not to study to be a doctor (as so many Druitt men
had). Instead he studied at Oxford, and practiced as a barrister.

Additionally he worked as a teacher in Blackheath from 1881. He was
dismissed from that job (at George Valentine's boarding school) in 1888.
At the same time his mother was suffering from depression and madness
(she died two years later, in 1890, in an asylum). It's possible that
Druiit broke down mentally after the Kelly murder. That he was both
exhilarated and fully and finally appalled and ashamed of himself. If
this is the case, recent evidence demonstrates that Druitt argued his
final case effectively. Possibly Druitt remained intelligent, but not so
emotionally. Macnaughten, upon whose report much of the suspicion is
based, (that he is the Ripper) nevertheless makes some stupendous errors
in his assessment: he describes Druitt as a doctor, and puts Druitt's
age 10 years off the mark. This seems, in large part, to invalidate
Macnaughten as a credible investigator, and Inspector Frederick
Abberline has argued the same point, going so far as to doubt Druitt's
connection to the Ripper.

I disagree with Abberline for a few fairly unscientific reasons. One,
the handwriting in the three letters is similar to Druitt's. Secondly,
given the circumstances of Druitt vis-a-vis his parents, Druitt can be
reasonably assumed to have a motive (to get revenge against his mother
for going mad, and allowing him to be born, and to subconsciously live
out the fantasy of being like his father). Thirdly, Druitt did have the
use of accommodation in close proximity to the murders. A picture of
Druitt shows a man with darkness in his eyes, but an otherwise
gentlemanly demeanor. There is the beginning of a moustache (the Ripper
was said to have one).

It's my opinion that Druitt didn't commit suicide, but that his family
suspected him all along, and had him murdered (his coat was filled with
heavy stones, and his body was not discovered until weeks after he began
his sleep on the bottom of the river). They were a well to do family,
and given the Ripper's worldwide reknown, capture would mean the wiping
out of the family reputation and possibly ruin their ability to practice
(as physicians).

Montague Druitt died shortly after the last murder (committed on Nov. 9,
1888). It was at the end of that terrible year that his body was found
floating in the River Thames at Chiswick; on the last day of 1888. He
was 31 years old.

Research derived in part from Daniel Farson's (1927-1997) 'Jack the
Ripper'.



google.com, pub-0240078091788753, DIRECT, f08c47fec0942fa0

Need a reading, mandala or some jewelry?  Check it out. 

Bonnie Vent products and services website

 

Readings/Consultation button


NBC, ABC, CBS, FOX, KUSI, Good Morning San Diego Logo Banner

Web Design by: Genesis Creations Entertainment

©Copyright 2002-2023 San Diego Paranormal.  Copying content or pictures from this site is prohibited. Copying of any portion of this site for commercial use is expressly prohibited.